Practicing my Scales

grove, photograph

“It seems to me that a photographer who takes [images without an underlying idea] is exactly like a pianist who repeatedly plays the scales.”

– Brooks Jensen, Letting Go of the Camera

I struggle constantly with this issue of taking photographs that are just visually interesting and taking those that are inspired by an idea. Especially since most of my work falls in the “fine art” category (as opposed to photojournalism or editorial). I feel like I should have an idea in play before I take the picture but, to be honest, I’m usually looking around for something that I know is or can be made visually compelling. Most of the time I don’t sit around coming up with a specific idea and then go out in search of images that express that idea.

I think a lot of it has to do with what one considers an idea. How broadly can it be defined? How important does the idea need to be? For example, I just completed a small project where I photographed rolls of paper in my studio – the idea was to capture their geometric qualities in an abstract fashion, to reduce them to curves, lines and shapes. I guess this is an idea, though not a very important one. But some of the images were pleasing to look at.

Jensen believes good photography is about ideas but does allow that the just-visually-interesting shot (what he calls tones and zones) has value – they’re necessary exercise akin to playing scales, just insufficient on their own.

I’ll take solace in this for now. As I go out and do my zones and tones work, I’ll remind myself that I’m just doing my scales (something I refused to do when learning to play the piano!).

 

Advertisements

12 responses to “Practicing my Scales

  1. The question that arises for me is when is an idea born? For example, as you see something that is visually interesting, an idea arises that you could make something with that… Perhaps it is useful to distinguish between concepts (ideas) and inspiration(ideas in the moment)

    • Laura

      I agree – I think the kind of idea we’re discussing here is more the “concept”. Sometimes the concept can be identified after the shot is taken but before it is printed. Somehow this seems a little like cheating to me, but I do it all the time!

  2. I don’t know – I think the idea of studying everyday objects in new ways is a concept in and of itself. I guess I worry more about photographing with ‘intent’ – does each picture have, on some level, a purpose? Could I say why I am taking this shot? In some cases, it might just be to record something, or to explore a naturally occurring symmetry, or whatever – the point is that I’m aware of why I am taking this picture, so then I can make the ‘best’ decisions about how to take it (err… for a given, completely subjective value of best).

    • I think the point you raise about being “aware of why” you’re taking the picture is the key one for me. Are some reasons better than others? Is there a value that can be placed on them? Are some reasons more complex, deeper, more meaningful? Should we try to pursue those?

  3. I don’t know. This seems like one of those subjects that would have different interpretations depending on the person. Do you not think a lot of the truly great music and art that exists today was a result of playing around, happy accidents, or whatever you’d like to call it? Do you think each masterpiece was created with intent?

    It makes me think of a particular incident. I went out one day to photograph skaters without any real purpose – so I guess you could say I was practicing my scales. But then I saw this scene where a man was almost silhouetted against the background of other skaters, and his head was hung down. In an instant I recognized the posture as fitting into a theme of loneliness which I explore often. That image, titled Wonderland, is one of my best sellers.

    While I had gone out without intent, where does that leave me when I recognize a possible image which fits into an existing theme? Does it make me less of an artist that the image happened by chance? Or does the ability to recognize the potential make you like the pianist who, while playing around, discovers a new composition?

    • I agree completely that there is room for experimenting, playing around and for the serendipitous. In fact, it’s necessary to devote time to these things.

      My concern personally is that I wonder if too much, perhaps most, of my shooting falls into this category. What is the right balance to strike between planned (I like “intentional” better) and unplanned shooting?

      When I have decided upon a series or long term project and pursued it with intention, overall the work is more meaningful to me somehow than the shots I stumble upon. I’m not saying they are better photographs, at least individually. And others may not really care about my process or intentions so what is popular is also a tricky barometer.

      To continue the metaphor, as a musician I need to practice my scales and spend time on improvisation but I think another dimension of artistry comes when you have an idea, a vision and you pursue it – I’m sure all great symphonies were created this way.

  4. As usual I struggle to keep up with your philosophical craft. I will say that the times I head out with a purpose in mind, I tend to come home with “goal achieved” shots. But I’m with Roberta, I have no problem with a great image having come from “being in the moment.”

    I believe all in all, I value this ability higher than setting out with a specific purpose.

    Very nice wipe btw, the inclusion of the sky is different and welcome.

    • I don’t see these as exclusive – I think if you have an idea in mind, you still have to be in the moment to find the right way to express yourself. And grabbing a shot that you didn’t plan or envision in advance is fine, too. We all do that and should.

      I know, Bob, you’re starting work on a long term project that has tremendous potential meaning in it. Somehow I feel that if you pull that off at the quality you’ve exhibited in your more “spontaneous” work, you will find it a more meaningful experience because of the thought, planning and intent underlying it.

  5. This is the aspect that I struggled with in trying to learn guitar (which I ultimately stopped to my regret), and one that I also struggle with in photography. I have to constantly remind myself that both practice and spontaneity have their purpose when it really comes time to draw upon them at the same time. I suppose it is natural to crave the excitement of the spontaneous work. It is all too easy to forget that the mundane aspects of practice help us react when we need it. Hmmm, maybe I need to pick up that guitar again. 🙂

  6. Pingback: Roberta Murray

  7. Pingback: Work Or Play?

  8. This is a beautifully compelling image. I believe you (we) should be inspired by the vision without regarding the reason. An image which resonates with you, which stirs you, has its own reason. This one generates the struggle of growth against the showers of light reigning down into the realm of gravity. Its radiating energy seems increased by the lack of foliage. It generates its own mystery. A place unknown and perhaps not even believed. What more reason might it need?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s